Multiliteracies and Writing in Grade One
Interweaving proven practices in the 21st century classroom
Ontario teachers are required to have students write complete, interesting sentences. By the end of grade one, students need to be able to write several sentences that begin differently, connect to each other, include details, are easy to read, and are grammatically correct. How can we shift a reluctant teacher and student to become intrinsically motivated about writing in school? How teachers create meaningful events and "offer interesting experiences within those boundaries that might have a lingering effect" (Sumara, 2002, p. 158)?
Connecting students with events that are personally meaningful to them will result in increased engagement (Allington, 2012). The books The Day the Crayons Quit and The Day the Crayons Came Back are excellent resources to engage students in writing and learning about perspective. With the writing activities described in the Perspective Prezi, my intention is to create literacy events that are "both aesthetic enjoyment, and creative and critical learning" (Sumara, 2002, p. 93). When our class participated in our crayons project, everyone felt the excitement and energy in the room. It is because,as a collective group we loved these books, that the activities worked so well (Sumara, 2012). All students understood the perspective of the crayons and were highly engaged in the illustrations both texts provide.
Effective Strategies in Overt Instruction
In grade one, Overt Instruction typically originates from the teacher. Implementing the Multiliteracies framework there are increased opportunities, where peers teach each other specific concepts (e.g., peer editing), but most of the Overt Instruction is delivered by the classroom teacher. If we can underpin this instruction with effective strategies, students will be more engaged in their learning and their understanding of concepts are more likely to "stick."
In the article, Critical Literacy as Resistance, Wallowitz (2008), describes a banking model of instruction where the teacher's role is to deposit information in each student's bank of knowledge. This description attempts to persuade the reader that this is a negative form of instructional practices; however, I can accept this metaphor as one of the methods teachers implement in the classroom. At times, especially in the early primary classroom, this is exactly what a student may require. There are moments in the educational day when we do need to overtly explain how language works and perhaps have a peer in the class teach another student a key understanding (e.g., /c/ and /k/ can sound the same). Gibson (20o8) explains that "children need explicit scaffolding, expertly delivered instructional conversations that address the language, knowledge, and strategies required for problem-solving"(p. 324). Depositing information into student banks is a necessary component of literacy; it is just not the only method for literacy instruction.
I agree with Plantaleo (2016, April) in that "all schools need competent, caring and high-expectation teachers who are knowledgeable about and confident in their pedagogy, who understand the multifaceted nature of their responsibility for student learning and who expect the best of and for their students" (p. 91). The effective strategies described below are intended for a grade one classroom, but could certainly be implemented in a kindergarten program as well as grades two and three.
A Good Beginning


Overt Instruction for Perspective and Letter Writing
Guided Writing

Here are our classroom's guided reading and writing table. I agree with Gibson's (2008) description of "the characteristics of effective reading instruction overlap with those of effective writing instruction" (p. 325). I have created a Multiliteracies WIX for Struggling Readers and Writers in Grade One. I encourage you to peruse that site as well because it includes the effective reading instruction.
Reading WIX
What is guided writing?
​
"small-group context allows teachers to provide high levels of immediate, targeted support while each student writes his or her own short but complete text" (Gibson, 2008, p, 325)
​
"students are actively engaged in their own sustained writing" (Gibson, 2008, p. 328)
​
"guided writing lessons might occur after a whole-class writing lesson has been completed and students are writing independently" (Gibson, 2008, p. 326)
​
"students rehearse new ways of talking about topics of interest" (Gibson, 2008, p. 326)
teachers are providing "feed forward [feedback] focuses the writer's attention on what strategies to use next" (Gibson, 2008, p.328)
​
"It is not necessary, however, for every student to participate in a guided writing lesson every day. Instead, teachers should make intentional, thoughtful decisions about which students are in need of a "shot in the arm" regarding writing at any point in time" (Gibson, 2008, p. 325).
​
Before students begin to write, I have them think and then talk about their ideas. I enlist the "multimodal processes of writing by their integration of talking, drawing, and writing" (Boyle & Charles, 2011, p.16). The social situation of students orally sharing their ideas with each other requires them to construct their thinking (Wilson & Chevaz, 2014) and as a result, they are better able to write. Students share with others at the carpet, in parteners, inside outside cirlces, at Tribbles, and during guided writing.



Tribbles show emotions (e.g, happy, sad, excited). Students go to the Tribble that best shows their feelings about a particular event (e.g., How was your weekend?)
First students draw their
ideas and then they talk
with a friend about their
image.

After milling to music students find a random parter and talk about the topic (e.g, weekend events, their plan for a writing activity).